Track 12 · Predators · lesson 2
Returns that cannot exist
11 min
Track 12 · Predators · lesson 2
11 min
Three percent a month. It is a modest-sounding number, which is the point — it sits below the threshold at which people become suspicious, and well above anything that has ever been sustained.
Compounded, three percent a month is a little over 42% a year. Start with 10,000 and leave it alone for thirty years at that rate and you finish with somewhere over 400 million. Leave it fifty years and the figure runs past 500 billion, from a starting sum most households could assemble.
That is the whole argument of this lesson. A rate is not a property of an investment. It is a claim about the entire future output of the world, and most claimed rates are claims that the world will be several times over.
Any sustained rate of return implies a rate at which real things are produced, because a return has to be paid out of something someone made.
A rate far above the growth of the economy it is drawn from can be true for a while and cannot be true for long, for a reason that has nothing to do with markets: the money would eventually have to exceed everything there is. Rates of that size are not implausible in the way an unlikely event is implausible. They are impossible in the way a perpetual motion machine is impossible.
The model below tops out at 25% a year, which is well under half of the implied rate above. Start with 1,000 and find the year it passes a million.
Compound growth
Hypothetical model, not a forecast
Grows a starting balance plus a fixed yearly contribution at a constant rate.
It assumes
It ignores
Leave the rate at its maximum and the starting balance at 1,000. Find the number of years at which the balance passes a million.
| Year | Balance |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1k |
| 1 | 1.3k |
| 2 | 1.6k |
| 3 | 2k |
| 4 | 2.4k |
| 5 | 3.1k |
| 6 | 3.8k |
| 7 | 4.8k |
| 8 | 6k |
| 9 | 7.5k |
| 10 | 9.3k |
| 11 | 11.6k |
| 12 | 14.6k |
| 13 | 18.2k |
| 14 | 22.7k |
| 15 | 28.4k |
| 16 | 35.5k |
| 17 | 44.4k |
| 18 | 55.5k |
| 19 | 69.4k |
| 20 | 86.7k |
Not there yet — keep moving the controls.
Around thirty-one years, from a thousand, at a rate roughly half the one in the pitch. That is the reason this arithmetic is worth doing before evaluating anyone's credibility: the number defeats itself without any reference to who is offering it.
Predict
There are not many sources, and listing them is a useful discipline because every real return is one of these and every claimed return has to be assigned to one.
Production. A business makes something and sells it for more than it cost. This is the only source that creates rather than moves, and it is bounded by how fast real output grows.
Rent. Something you own is used by someone else who pays for the use. Bounded by what the use is worth to them.
Lending. You give up money now for more later, and the extra is priced by the risk of not being repaid. Higher rates here are not a better deal; they are a description of how likely you are to lose the principal.
Repricing. Someone pays more for the thing than you did. Nothing was produced. This can be large and it is a transfer, which means somebody else's position is the mirror image of yours.
Other people's deposits. Not a return at all, and the subject of the next lesson.
Not the same thing
A large payment relative to the amount committed, over a period.
The same large percentage, achieved every period, indefinitely.
Which is which? Put each one on a side.
A business that grew tenfold over eight years and then settled
A monthly figure presented as what the arrangement produces, ongoing
A rate quoted per week, with an annual figure never mentioned
Once a rate has been converted to an annual figure and compounded out, two questions do most of the remaining work.
Which source is this? Production, rent, lending, repricing or deposits. Every real return is one of them. An answer that does not fit any of the five, or that requires two of them at once in ways that cannot be separated, is worth a great deal of attention.
Why is this available to me? If a mechanism reliably produces several times what capital normally earns, the constraint on it is not the supply of customers. Anyone with access to it can borrow at ordinary rates and keep the difference, which is a far better business than selling participations. A mechanism being offered rather than used is information about the mechanism.
Check